![Bradley Manning - Caricature Bradley Manning - Caricature](https://i0.wp.com/farm9.static.flickr.com/8489/8240508776_2c99aa6b4f_m.jpg)
Bradley Manning – Caricature (Photo credit: DonkeyHotey)
Yochai Benkler | Guardian UK | Reader Supported News | July 20, 2013
Without an informed and free press, there cannot be an enlightened people. That’s what this trial is really about.
Thursday, Colonel Denise Lind, the judge in the Bradley Manning court martial, refused to dismiss the “aiding the enemy” charge. The decision is preliminary, and the judge could still moderate its effect if she finds Manning not guilty. But even if she ultimately acquits Manning, the decision will cast a long shadow on national security journalists and their sources.
First, this case is about national security journalism, not WikiLeaks. At Monday’s argument in preparation for Thursday’s ruling, the judge asked the prosecution to confirm: does it make any difference if it’s WikiLeaks or any other news organization: New York Times, Washington Post, or Wall Street Journal? The prosecution answered: “No, it would not. It would not potentially make a difference.”
Second, the decision establishes a chilling precedent: leaking classified documents to the these newspapers can by itself be legally sufficient to constitute the offense of “aiding the enemy”, if the leaker was sophisticated enough about intelligence and how the enemy uses the internet.
Read more