Defense Secretary Nominee Offers Promises, but No Plan, to Tackle Sexual Assault in the Military


Zoë Carpenter | The Nation | February 6, 2015

Ashton Carter

Secretary of Defense nominee Ashton Carter testifies at his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill on February 4, 2015. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

The Defense Department is about to get a new boss, but he’s not likely to change the way the military handles sexual assault cases.

Secretary of Defense nominee Ashton Carter faced several questions related to sexual violence in the military during his confirmation hearing Wednesday, which he is expected to sail through. In response, Carter said that sexual assaults are “particularly offensive in the military,” and acknowledged that the armed services are not doing enough to stop retaliation against service members who report such crimes. But he offered few specifics as to how he would address the issue.

Carter also indicated that he would preserve the current structure of the military justice system, which puts commanding officers in charge of sexual assault prosecutions. Whether that system sets up conflicts of interest and discourages reporting, or is essential for getting commanders to “buy in” to efforts to combat sexual assault, is the defining point of disagreement between lawmakers concerned about the problem. Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and several dozen of her colleagues have long advocated for a reform that would allow military prosecutors to decide when accusations of a crime warrant a court-martial. But the Pentagon’s allies in the Senate—most vocally, Missouri Democrat Claire McCaskill—argue that the problem can be dealt with through more modest reforms; so far they’ve succeeded in blocking Gillibrand’s measure.

Read more

Obama Doubles Number of Troops Authorized for Iraq


Missy Ryan | The Washington Post | Reader Supported News | November 8, 2014

resident Obama authorized Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on Friday to send up to 1,500 additional U.S. troops to Iraq, roughly doubling the force the United States has built up since June to fight the Islamic State militants who control much of Iraq and Syria.

The announcement of a major increase in the force in Iraq deepens U.S. involvement in a messy regional conflict that officials are warning may last for years. The White House said it would request $5.6 billion for the military campaign against the Islamic State, including $1.6 billion to train and equip Iraqi troops.

If funding for the plan is approved, the additional U.S. troops will expand a military advisory mission in Iraq that began in the summer and will establish a new effort to train Iraqi forces, Rear Adm. John F. Kirby, the Pentagon’s press secretary, told reporters.

Read more

Sexual Assaults and Nuclear Missiles


Robert Reich | Robert Reich’s Blog | Reader Supported News | May 9, 2013

After years of repeated reports of sexual assaults – and years of promises to prevent them, and then years of studies and commissions to find the best way of doing so – a Defense Department study released Tuesday estimates that some 26,000 people in the military were sexually assaulted in the last fiscal year, up from about 19,000 the year before.

Moreover, it turns out the Air Force lieutenant colonel in charge of preventing sexual assault has been arrested for  … sexual assault. According to the police report, a drunken Lt. Col. Jeff Krusinski allegedly approached a woman in a parking lot in Arlington, Va. Sunday night, and grabbed her breasts and buttocks.

Why has it been so difficult for the Air Force or the Defense Department to remedy this problem?

Speaking of which, the Air Force has just removed from duty seventeen launch officers at the Minot nuclear missile base in North Dakota – one of three bases responsible for controlling, and, if necessary, launching, strategic nuclear missiles – for violating weapons safety rules. The base commander characterized their negligence as “rot.”

One officer was found to have intentionally broken a safety rule that could have compromised the secret codes enabling missiles to be launched.

Read more

Demand Sec. Hagel remove 2 Air Force pilots following Aviano sexual assault scandal


To: Chuck Hagel, United States Secretary of Defense

Last month with a flick of his pen, Lt. Gen. Craig Franklin set justice aside and overruled a jury’s verdict convicting Lt. Col. James Wilkerson of aggravated sexual assault of a civilian contractor at Aviano Air Base. As his punishment, Wilkerson was dismissed from the Air Force and …
Last month with a flick of his pen, Lt. Gen. Craig Franklin set justice aside and overruled a jury’s verdict convicting Lt. Col. James Wilkerson of aggravated sexual assault of a civilian contractor at Aviano Air Base. As his punishment, Wilkerson was dismissed from the Air Force and sentenced to one year in jail. Franklin’s reversal freed his fellow fighter pilot and reinstated him back into the Air Force, in part because he was described by friends and family as  a “doting father and husband.”  To General Franklin, it didn’t matter that Wilkerson had failed a lie-detector test or that his own legal counsel recommended against overruling the verdict. Instead, Franklin claimed that Wilkerson’s conviction and punishment should be overturned because he was a “doting father and husband.”  Franklin failed to mention that Wilkerson had a long history of misconduct.  He had already been caught peeking over a bathroom stall while a subordinate’s wife urinated. Wilkerson egregiously violated safety standards, pulled rank to fend off law enforcement officials, was abusive to fellow military officials — and that’s just what we know so far. 

Despite strong corroborating testimony from independent witnesses and clear supporting facts on the record, Franklin, who did not attend the trial, decided that he did not believe the victim. Heard that before?  Unless Franklin is dismissed from the service for his biased and unfounded reversal of Wilkerson’s conviction, Franklin’s actions will have a chilling effect on victims who might otherwise report being sexually assaulted. It sends exactly the wrong message to bystanders, investigators, prosecutors, judges, and juries who otherwise might try to do the right thing. It confirms to sexual predators that they face little risk of being punished.
The attack at Aviano is just one of almost twenty thousand similar incidents occurring every year throughout the military. Eighty-five percent of victims do not report the crime, mainly out of fear of retaliation, and not being believed. Most disturbing of all, out of the 3,200 cases reported in 2010, less than 190 reports of sexual assault in the military actually ended in a conviction. Wilkerson’s conviction was one of those rare instances where justice was served — or so it seemed.
Secretary Hagel, you must remove Lt. Gen. Franklin and Lt. Col. Wilkerson for failing our country, and for failing our young service members and civilians who work on our bases around the world. You cannot allow this subversion of justice to stand. 

Sign the Petition

7,500

5,684 people signed the petition

 

Fib
Lt. Gen. Craig Franklin (left) ignored the facts and overturned fellow Air Force pilot Lt. Col. James Wilkerson’s (right) aggravated sexual assault conviction at Aviano Air Base, Italy.

Please join us: Tell Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to protect our service members from rape and sexual assault! Remove Lt. Gen. Franklin and Lt. Col. Wilkerson from the United States Air Force. The only way to end the epidemic of sexual assault in the military is to hold leaders, like Franklin, who cover up and condone these crimes and those who commit the crimes, like Wilkerson, accountable. Our service members deserve better. Our country deserves better.   The crisis of rape and sexual abuse in the military threatens good order and discipline within the ranks of the armed services. It threatens the safety and livelihood of our men and women in uniform, and their families. And it threatens the national security of the United States.
Franklin’s subsequent explanation showed no valid basis to overturn the conviction, decided by a jury comprised of senior military officers, that he selected.  What mattered to Franklin was that Wilkerson like himself was a senior officer and fighter pilot. They served together in Iraq and had many mutual friends. What mattered was the “good ol’ boys” network.
Leaders who fail to prosecute and punish the sexual predators in our military services must face consequences, or the culture that fosters this epidemic will never end.  Survivors of military sexual assault are calling on Defense Sec. Hagel to discharge Lt. Gen. Franklin and Lt. Col. Wilkerson. Please help Protect Our Defenders and sign their petition!
Members of Congress, from both parties, have condemned Franklin’s egregious action.  “Franklin clearly substituted his own independent judgment for that of the convened fact-finding panel,” said Rep. Michael Turner, R-Ohio, a member of the House Armed Services Committee.
“This [Franklin’s explanation] letter, is filled with selective reasoning and assumptions from someone with no legal training, and it’s appalling that the reasoning spelled out in the letter served as the basis to overturn a jury verdict in this case,” said Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO) – Wall Street Journal.  The Senator went on to say, according to the Washington Post, parts of Franklin’s letter explaining his actions, “just set my teeth on edge.”

Take Action

A Defense Secretary, Blocked by Politics


For the last four years, Senate Republicans have used the power of the filibuster to block legislation, bottle up nominees to courts and government departments, and strangle federal agencies, even though they are in the minority. On Thursday, they hit a new low. They successfully filibustered Chuck Hagel, President Obama’s nominee for defense secretary, the first time a cabinet nominee for this post has been prevented from receiving an up-or-down vote.

The Republicans claimed they needed more information about Mr. Hagel, though he answered every question at his confirmation hearing and provided more paperwork than usual. As a former Republican senator, in fact, Mr. Hagel is better known to his old colleagues than most nominees. A delay of another week or two, which some members said they were seeking, is not going to change anyone’s opinion.

Some senators tried to use the nomination to reignite last year’s smoldering fight over the deaths of American diplomats in Benghazi, Libya, demanding to know when Mr. Obama spoke to the president of Libya after the attack. This exercise in political score-settling obviously has nothing to do with Mr. Hagel, and the White House had no obligation to respond, but it did anyway, saying Mr. Obama spoke to the president the day after the attack.

Read more

G.O.P. Blocks Vote in Senate on Hagel for Defense Post


 | New York Times | February 14, 2013

WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked President Obama’s nominee to lead the Pentagon in a defiant move likely to further strain partisan tensions while preventing the White House, at least temporarily, from assembling its second-term national security team.

In a result that broke down almost strictly along party lines, Democratic senators could not muster the support to advance the nomination of Chuck Hagel, a former Republican senator from Nebraska, to a final vote. The vote was 58 to 40, falling short of the 60 that were needed.

Democrats vowed to try again to resuscitate the nomination of Mr. Hagel, a decorated Vietnam veteran, when the Senate returns from recess in 10 days. Several Republicans who voted against Mr. Hagel said they would not block a final vote.

Read more

Obama’s Genius Defense Pick


Steve Erickson | American Prospect | January 14, 2013

The Republican Party is given these days to hysteria, and what appears at the moment to be a white-guy cabinet in the second Obama term is more likely the result of botched orchestration than anything. That doesn’t mean there isn’t something to South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham’s contention that the president is deliberately getting in the opposition’s face with his recent nominations. As those of us who have been supportive of the president wrestle with the moral question of whether he deserves as much grief as we would have given a newly elected Mitt Romney for filling the three biggest jobs in his administration with old white males, or whether Obama’s first term—including a female secretary of State and two female Supreme Court appointments—earns him some slack, the Machiavellian genius of the choices is lost. The Republicans are in disarray not because they drew some particularly wacky names from a hat when it came to fielding congressional candidates but because their constituency is wacky, something so obvious that the only option for pols and pundits alike is to ignore it: A third of the country is fucking out of its mind. Of course some portion of the country always has been out of its mind, which is what Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln and Quentin Tarantino’s Django Unchained are about, and the country’s task always has been transcending this. But now that Republican psychosis has become so pronounced even the party itself is beset by flashes of self-awareness, a cleave has developed into which Field Marshal Barack drives his pincer division of Kerry, Hagel, and Lew.

Hagel is the key. Why would Obama pick him? people scratch their heads, pondering the coming conflagration. Why would he fight for Hagel for secretary of State when he wouldn’t fight for Susan Rice (to whom by all accounts the president is personally closer)? Leaving aside the fact that John Kerry was always a better choice than Rice for State, and acknowledging the logic that former center-right Republican senator Chuck Hagel is the man to extract cuts from the Defense Department on behalf of a center-left Democratic commander-in-chief, less stated reasons suggest that Obama has more a knack for the politics of metaphor than even his allies have allowed. The key constituency up for grabs in today’s body politic is white working-class men. While the president assumes correctly that he stores credit with women, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, gay Americans—read it as taking them for granted if you will—in the meantime blue-collar white guys have viewed the black president and his party with enough suspicion to continue voting for a rich man’s party and against their blue-collar white-guy interests.

As General Colin Powell implied in his Meet the Press interview yesterday, Obama’s appointment of Hagel compels Republicans to figure out who they are. Now we will have the spectacle of Republican senators opposing a decorated two-fisted Republican war hero as disinclined to go to war as other war heroes from Powell back to Eisenhower. The more that supposedly seasoned members of the GOP claim that Hagel is out of the mainstream for challenging the buildup in Iraq and potential war with Iran (skepticism with which the public agrees on both counts by large margins), then the more that Republicans lurch rightward in the eyes of the public at large and, in particular, two-fisted guys sitting in front of their televisions curling beer cans into furious fistfuls of metal every time Lindsey Graham opens his mouth. Hagel’s confirmation depends on a certain amount of deftness on his part, which means saying nothing too inartfully and no heretofore unknown scandal suddenly emerging, leaving his opponents no basis for attacking him other than their own positions that are at odds with not only the non-crazy two-thirds of the country but working white guys exhausted of their own lurking lunacy by the end of every long working day. Because Republicans aren’t nearly as smart as the rest of us have thought for the last 30 years, they’ll go after Hagel first because they’ve decided to give Kerry a pass and because they believe that Hagel is more vulnerable than Treasury nominee Jack Lew; in fact Hagel is the linchpin in this phalanx, the masterstroke, and if he wins confirmation at considerable cost to his own party, the others (including Lew) march in behind him, the Republican fever breaking—as the president once predicted—if only for a moment. The president who terminated bin Laden is trading his team of rivals for a brigade of brawlers in order to win back white-male Reagan Democrats once and for all.

Read more

Hagel Approval Looks Likely After Schumer OK


Eric Linton | International Business Times | January 15, 2013

Chuck Hagel’s chances of becoming U.S. defense secretary got a critical boost Tuesday when two leading Senate Democrats came out in favor of confirming him following assurances on Israel and the treatment of gay and lesbian servicemen.

Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate, and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., a senior member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said Hagel had eased their concerns over his stands on Israel, Iran and other issues, Reuters reported.

“Based on several key assurances provided by Senator Hagel, I am currently prepared to vote for his confirmation,” Schumer said in an extensive statement. “I encourage my Senate colleagues who have shared my previous concerns to also support him.”

Read more

GOP Senator Now Questions Hagel’s ‘Temperament’


Rebecca Leber | Think Progress | January 13, 2013

Former GOP Sen. Chuck Hagel received bipartisan support after President Obama nominated him for Secretary of Defense last week.  Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN),  who served with Hagel on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also praised him as someone he is “very open to” for the nomination: “Certainly his name coming forward is one I’m very open to. I had good relations with him while he was in the Senate.”

 

But this Sunday, during an appearance on This Week, Corker echoed the criticism of the smear campaign against Hagel, and raised vague concerns about his “temperament”:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS (HOST): You had some positive things to say about Senator Hagel when his name was first floated. You said he  had a good relations on the Senate foreign realtions committee. Do you see anything that should disqualify him fromt he Pentagon post?

CORKER: Well I think like a lot of people the hearings are going to have a huge effect on me […] You know, I have a lot of questions about just this whole nuclear posture abuse. Those are things that haven’t been discussed yet. Obviously people have concerns about his stance towards Iran and Israel. But I think another thing, George, that’s going to come up is just his overall temperament, and is he suited to run a department or big agency or a big entity like the Pentagon.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you have questions about his temperament?

CORKER: I think there are a number of staffers who are coming forth no just talking about the way he has dealt with them. I certainly have quesitons about a lot of things.

Following Hagel’s nomination, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, former Secretary of State Gen. Colin Powell, and former top U.S. ambassador Ryan Crocker all announced their support. And despite the noise from the right, there is little evidence Hagel’s confirmation is in question.

Read more

Powell champions Hagel as defense secretary and rips some Republicans


Tom Curry | NBC News | January 13, 2013

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell said on NBC’s Meet the Press Sunday that President Barack Obama’s nominee to be defense secretary, former Sen. Chuck Hagel, was “superbly qualified” and would be a strong advocate for Americans in uniform.

“This is a guy who would be very careful about putting their lives at risk because he put his life at risk,” Powell told NBC’s David Gregory.

Hagel, who was seriously wounded while serving as an Army infantryman in Vietnam, was a Republican senator from Nebraska from 1997 to 2009.

Read more