U.S. Supreme Court building. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Brian Tashman | Right Wing Watch | AlterNet | September 3, 2013
David Usher of the Center for Marriage Policy is out with a new column, “ Our last chance to save traditional marriage,” lamenting that the Defense of Marriage Act wasn’t properly defended at the Supreme Court because it was “never argued that gay marriage is unequal and unconstitutional.”
Usher argues that if same-sex marriage is legal then women will marry other women and have children with men “by pretending they are using birth control when they are not.” “Entrapped men become economically-conscripted third parties to these marriages,” Usher writes, adding that women will also turn to the state for welfare benefits. Good heterosexual couples will be left “economically-disadvantaged” because they will be taxed to support the lesbian couples’ Big Government goodies.
But that’s not all: Usher then explains that gay men will have it the worst of all as they will be tricked into having sex with lesbians through “reproductive entrapment,” fathering their kids, and then paying child support to support them: “Marriages between two men are destined to be the marital underclass. In most cases, these men will become un-consenting ‘fathers’ by reproductive entrapment. Men in male-male marriages who become fathers by deceptive means will be forced to pay child support to women in bi-maternal marriages, and become economically enslaved” to lesbian unions.
Daily Queer News 
This is absurd in so many ways. What most people, and certainly trans people, point out, most homosexual men are better off financially, as especially white males make more money and since they are not married have more spendable money. So this man/argument is nuts.
AND, how does he think a gay man would be tricked into having sex with a female??? Some do volunteer to give women their sperm, but there are sperm banks-is the man unaware of that?
And I hate to sound like a racist, but many men, especially black men, have sex with a woman and have no intention of being a father, so what this man is talking about is a racial/heterosexual issue, so equality marriages, have nothing to do with the lousy shape of heterosexual marriages. which does lead to children needing taxpayer supprt, etc.
LikeLike